Tuesday, April 19, 2011

is webmail private at work

The question I have in not a matter of legality. Rather a matter of privacy. I work in a small office. We have one large server and all 5 of us including the administrater have a computer at our desk. All except me (because I have no reason to) have a p.o.p. e-mail address set up which uses the company email In other words smpt and p.o.p outlook express email. My outlook express is not even set up. I do not which is fine with me. All I use is my webmail and nobody know my password. My question is can the administor have access to read my email either sent or received. Again, I am not concerned with the legalality, just the fact is it able to be done? I have heard not but would like an expert opinion with you guys. And if so, how can I make it private. Thank you so much for your help

Reply 1 : is webmail private at work

While http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/employees-rights.htm is a great read anything you type on their machines is subject to someone seeing it without anyone having a privacy right.

The lessons on such cases is clear. If you have any reason to fear it being read or seen, don't do this at the office.
Bob

Reply 2 : is webmail private at work

if it goes through a server, someone can capture it.

Reply 3 : is webmail private at work

Bleh

Different wireless cards available?

I am curious, by all accounts, this should work, shouldn't it?



SR71-15 | Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.



Also, I just noticed the outdoor range....hmmm...

Reply 1 : Different wireless cards available?

Work in what? the pin set is different than Alienware .

Reply 2 : Different wireless cards available?


Quote:







Outdoor Range (Antenna Dependent) over 50km


sure, attaching one of these:



Reply 3 : Different wireless cards available?

Yea, I wasn't looking at the spec sheet correctly. Though it does give me an idea.



Yea, the 50km thing I knew was with a high end antenna, though the transmit power was relatively nice.

Reply 4 : Different wireless cards available?


Quote:







The Alienware forum is divided into a main Alienware discussion area and model specific subforums.



When creating a new thread, if it is model specific, please post to the model subforum. Only general Alienware discussion items should be posted to the main Alienware forum.


For assistance specific to your system, you will have better luck posting in the Alienware M11x subforum.

Reply 5 : Different wireless cards available?

High frequency, more radiation.

Win7 seamless integration with Ubuntu 10.10

Hi everyone,



I have finally taken the plunge and installed ubuntu as the default OS on my XPS 15 last week. So far, everything has been good. I am using WINE to get some essential software to run. I wondered if it is possible to do a seamless integration of Win7 with ubuntu. What I want to do is something like Vmware's unity mode.



The applications will run on a virtualized windows OS, but I see only the application, without the OS elements like taskbar, desktop etc.



I did a lot of searching and found that this is possible with xp, using the rdp protocol via Virtualbox. But it doesn't seem to work in windows 7



Any suggestions on how to get this working will be highly appreciated







The attached pic shows windows applications running seamlessly on a Mac. I want to do exactly the same thing, but with Ubuntu.

Reply 1 : Win7 seamless integration with Ubuntu 10.10

Edit: I just reread your post. Actually IMO WINE is good enough, there is much less overhead than VM, I have seen people installing Big Windows 7 Applications on VM and it takes so long you can hear snickers...



Reply 2 : Win7 seamless integration with Ubuntu 10.10

WINE is very good. But for some of the more stubborn apps, running them on a virtual machine is the only choice!

Reply 3 : Win7 seamless integration with Ubuntu 10.10

There are lot of things that just can't be done under linux ... dual boot is the only working option.

Reply 4 : Win7 seamless integration with Ubuntu 10.10

I must be doing something wrong, I've never had much luck getting stuff working under wine.

Reply 5 : Win7 seamless integration with Ubuntu 10.10

That's vmware unity for mac, a similar product is parallels desktop which has linux host support.



You can also use 'Seamless Mode' in VirtualBox, it's not exactly the same but it integrates your VM taskbar and windows into your linux environment.

Intel 6205 vs. 6200

I noticed that the 6205 is the current 2x2 Intel card. Considering the 6300 doesn't have a successor, what's the difference between the 6200 and it's replacement the 6205?

Why do the trojans keep coming back after I do a full scan?

Hi guys,

I had a bunch of viruses on my computer a few weeks ago - I got MBAM, spybot S&D, ccleaner, & HijackThis & tried to get rid of everything.

Now when I run MBAM & Avast - the scan is currently showing up clean. But when I run a full scan with Spyware Doctor - a bunch of trojans keep reappearing.

This morning, there are atleast 2 trojans (scan's not complete yet) I found w/ spyware doctor:

trojan-downloader.murlo
trojan.generic

Why do the trojans keep reappearing? (Last night - I used ComboFix)

Reply 1 : Why do the trojans keep coming back after I do a full scan?

Having a dupe just confuses things.

Original thread
http://forums.cnet.com/7723-6132_102-523711.html

I am locking this one

Must-Read: SetFSB O/C Game Problems FIXED

TO ANYONE THAT USES SETFSB FOR GAMING LAPTOP OVERCLOCKING



and that's a lot of us



I recently discovered a problem with SetFSB causing 'timing issues' in games when overclocking. After a certain point, it becomes very noticeable that your games are out of sync; ever run an older game without a frame limiter and had it go in 'turbo mode'? Well, this is the same thing: even modern games can run 'too fast.' When overclocking my core i5, my character in Crysis would be running 50% faster! This is highly undesirable, and I have been searching for a fix for a week or so now. Apparently the issue hasn't been discussed much, but someone unexpectedly graced me with a solution!



Thanks to Unclewebb, the awesome, highly knowledgeable developer of the (IMHO) must-have overclocking utility 'ThrottleStop' (ESPECIALLY necessary for those of us with Core i 3/5/7 series CPU's in our laptops!!), I have found a solution for the game timing problems. Please read this post that he replied to me with, explaining the Why's and How's of it all:






Quote:








Originally Posted by unclewebb
View Post

The problem you guys are running into is a new Windows 7 "feature".



To accurately measure time in a Windows PC, software uses the QueryPerformanceCounter function. Many applications, especially games, depend on this Windows function to accurately calculate FPS as well as for many other timing purposes in game including sound.



The problem is that for many computers, this function in Windows 7 is now based on the clock speed of the processor. If you overclock in the bios and then boot up, this timer is calibrated and will work 100% correctly. If you use SetFSB or a similar program and you change the bus speed from within Windows, you have now just screwed up this very important timing mechanism. The number of applications that can choke after you do this is surprising, especially games.



I wrote a program called WinTimerTester to test for this problem.



WinTimerTester 1.1

WinTimerTester_1.1.zip

Download WinTimerTester_1.1.zip from Sendspace.com - send big files the easy way



What it does is it runs two different clocks in your CPU at the same time and compares them to make sure they are both running at the same speed. It compares the Windows GetTickCount function to the QueryPerformanceCounter function and within approximately 60 to 100 seconds, these two timers should be running at a perfect 1.0000 : 1 ratio.



If you overclock your CPU with SetFSB and WinTimerTester reports that these timers are not running at a 1.0000 : 1 ratio, that shows that you have this bug and you have also overclocked this important timer within your computer which can screw up a variety of programs in a variety of ways.



Luckily there is a solution to this Windows bug. Microsoft actually considers this a feature but for anyone that uses SetFSB on a regular basis, it's a big bug.



To fix this problem, open up a command window and type in this:



bcdedit /set useplatformclock true



You will have to exit the command window and reboot before this setting can take affect. What this does is it changes Windows so the QueryPerformanceCounter function will be based on a fixed counter that is not influenced by SetFSB. That one line of code should correct this problem and your games will run fine when using SetFSB.



If you ever want to go back to the original buggered up timer that Windows uses then open up a command window and type in this.



bcdedit /deletevalue useplatformclock



Once again, reboot and things will be back to the default Windows 7 timer. These two images should show you when your internal timers are broken and what WinTimerTester will report when your internal timer is fixed. This only applies to Windows 7. There is a similar fix for Windows XP so PM me if you need it.



http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/3778/timerbroken.png



http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/8417/timerfix.png



Let me know if this finally solves your problem. My friend some_one over on XtremeSystems told me about this little trick.



[In reply to]Disgustipated: On a different note. It would be a good idea to run ThrottleStop and increase your TDP/TDC settings to ensure that you get full turbo boost when you are overclocking with SetFSB. If you don't increase TDP/TDC then your bus speed can go up but your multiplier might go down when fully loaded so you won't get the full benefit of your overclock. Send me a PM if you need to know more about how to properly test for full turbo boost at full load.



One last thing. Many 3D gaming benchmarks don't correct for this problem so you can't trust their results when using SetFSB if your laptop has this timing issue. I believe the 3DMark series corrects for this problem and can be trusted.



Again, huge thanks to Unclewebb for figuring this out and taking the time to reply to me.



I am now running a constant 3.1 Ghz overclock while gaming, and my games are perfectly 'timed/syncd.' Awesome!



Also, if you want to achieve maximum Turbo Boost under load or push your laptop's performance to the max, ThrottleStop is a must-have.



For reference and context, please refer to this thread:



SetFSB Game Timing Problem? (G60JX)

Reply 1 : Must-Read: SetFSB O/C Game Problems FIXED

I guess this helps those with an extreme cpu oced under windows after it has booted to desktop as well?

I have to check it out.

Reply 2 : Must-Read: SetFSB O/C Game Problems FIXED

You only have this problem when using SetFSB or a similar program that changes the bus clock speed. When you overclock an Extreme processor like the X9000 by changing the multiplier, it doesn't screw up the internal clocks so everything should be OK. You can run the WinTimerTester program, links above, for about a minute to make sure that your clocks are in sync.

Reply 3 : Must-Read: SetFSB O/C Game Problems FIXED

A note for some people with dual HDD:



if you have a separate boot manager (linux, mac etc) you will need to either take out that hard drive and then do this, or just use a bcd editor.

'Start' 'all programs', how to rank them alphabetical?

If you hit 'start' and 'all programs', then how do
you make the programs list alphabetical?
Thanks.

Reply 1 : 'Start' 'all programs', how to rank them alphabetical?

Right click on the list, choose "sort by name".

Nearly all hits on the first page of http://www.google.com/search?q=xp+sort+all+programs would have told you. Did you know google is a great way to find the answer to questions like this? Maybe even greater than this forum.

Kees